"Scientists cast doubt on Kennedy bullet analysis" - WP today
A hat tip to chiggerbit at the RI board for coming up with this, from today's Washington Post:
The "evidence used to rule out a second assassin is fundamentally flawed," concludes a new article in the Annals of Applied Statistics written by former FBI lab metallurgist William A. Tobin and Texas A&M University researchers Cliff Spiegelman and William D. James.To be discussed at some future point.
..."Given the significance and impact of the JFK assassination, it is scientifically desirable for the evidentiary fragments to be re-analyzed," the researchers said.
Labels: conspiracy, fbi, jfk assassination, naa
posted by Real History Lisa at 5:27 PM - Permanent Link -
2 Comments:
Well that's smart of him. It's a damn cartoon! But it's nice to know that SOMEONE in the scientific world bothered to notice and then write something intelligent about it. We just need a lot more like him.
Dawn
Please google: “National Security Presidential Directive/NSPD 51” and “Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-20.”
This is worth a look. People should be worried. Barely a mention anywhere.
Post a Comment
<< Home